Thursday, December 17, 2009

Spiritual Love And Spiritual Discrimination


Spiritual Love And Spiritual Discrimination
By Robert Najemy

There are times when we face an inner conflict about how we
should  actually behave towards our loved ones when they are
asking us to do things for them that conflict with our sense of
justice, values or ethics or perhaps with our needs for time,
energy or money. 

For example, they might ask us:

1. To give them money.
2. To lend them money.
3. To do something for them that is their responsibility.
4. To tell a lie to cover up for them.
5. To go somewhere with them.
6. To avoid someone or not keep company with someone for some
reason.
7. To ignore a certain procedure, protocol or law.
8.  To spend time with them.
9.  To gossip about someone.
10. To engaged in activities that make us feel uncomfortable.
11. To solve their problems

On the one hand we love that person and want to express our
love by facilitating their needs and helping them be well and
happy. On the other hand, what they are asking may be in
conflict with our needs, attachments, fears, values, ethics or
sense of justice. 

In these situations we need "spiritual love with spiritual
discrimination". We need to evaluate what we are being asked to
do and pass it through a few clarifying filters. 

1. Is what they are asking us to do in alignment with our
conscience and ethical values? 

If yes, move ahead to the remaining questions. If not, you will
need to explain to the others that, while you love them and want
them to be happy, you cannot do something that brings you into
conflict with your conscience. You express to them your hope
that they can understand and that you would not want them ever
to do something for you that would put them in conflict with
their conscience and that you definitely want them to tell you
if and when that happens.  

2. Is what they are asking you to do, good for them or might it
harm them? 

The answer to this question is not always a clear yes or a
clear no.  If they are asking us to pay for illegal drugs or to
become accessories to some crime, the answer might be a clear
"no". But if they want us to give them a home and money while
they refuse to work and carry their load or are taking drugs or
excessively drinking, then we may not be so clear. 

On the one hand, we might be helping them by supporting them
and giving them time to be safe while they are able to work
through their problems. On the other hand,  they might just
become dependent and do nothing positive for themselves as long
as we cover them economically and they do not actually need to
change or work. This is a dilemma that most parents of drug
addicted children and families in co-dependent relationships
(perhaps with alcoholics) face on a daily basis.

Some parents experience this dilemma with children who would
like to be eternal students or eternal children always depending
on the parents. Some may experience this problem with their
spouse during a period of life crisis. We may have such a
problem with our parents when they lose  their energy and feel
the need to depend on us or have our attention.

What do we do? Do we accommodate them unconditionally? Do we
set limits? Do we harm them by allowing them to depend on us? Do
we harm them by not helping them? What is real love in such a
situation? 

3.  "If we were in the others' position, what would we really
like us to do? 

Some of us might answer, "I would like them  not to respond so
that I am forced to contact my inner resources and move forward
in my life."  Others might answer, "I would like the other to
accommodate my needs for a period of time, so I can stand on my
own feet." A few might answer, "I would like the other to take
over my life and care for everything and I would like to be free
not to do anything or have any responsibilities." Some might
answer, "I need to feel their love through their indulging me at
this time and then I will move on." 

I have seen situations in which parents repeatedly solve their
adult children's economic problems, give them their homes etc,
and receive only rejection and often hate from the children. One
reason for this might be that when we help someone by solving
their problems, we are actually saying to them (or they saying
to themselves), "you are weak, unable and worthless." When we do
something for others, that they can do for themselves, we might
be actually undermining their sense of self-worth and
self-confidence and they might end up hating us for that. Of
course, they might also hate us for not helping them. 

Note: The point here is not a question of whether or not they
will love us, but a question of  what is the most beneficial and
loving response from us in this situation.

Twelve-step groups suggest to the family members what they call
"tough love." Show love, but do not play their games. Do not
cover up for them. Do not pretend there is no problem. Love them
but do not support their problem. Love them but expect
responsibility. Love them but employ natural and logical
consequences when they are not responsible. Express your love to
them regularly while being  totally honest about your feelings
and needs. 

The same problem occasionally occurs between ill or elderly
persons and their caretakers. As caretakers we are not always
clear about how much help others really need and what limits are
good for them and for us. We are being asked to express love in
very specific ways. Some care for others in unloving, totally
mechanical ways. We need to find our balance. Love and serve
while being honest with ourselves and the others about what we
really feel that we can do for them and they can do for
themselves. 

4.  Have I given them enough chances? Have I helped enough
times but seen that they are not taking responsibility for their
lives? Do I feel that I need to give them more chances?

The answer to this question is not a matter of numbers or time
but rather a feeling that we have. At some point it just becomes
clear that we have done enough and that we can continue to love
and emotionally support others without solving their problems or
complying with their needs. We clearly feel that we can help
them much more by allowing them to become more self-dependent.
We can always be there for them emotionally offering love and
support as they now seek to find solutions for their problems.

Such clarity of feeling usually arises from an appreciation of
of balance in how many times and for what  duration we have
helped this person, and what type of effort we perceive on their
part.

We must also free ourselves from the role of the savior, parent
or the responsible one. In such roles we need the others to need
us. We might complain that they do nothing and depend on us, but
subconsciously we need them to be this way. We get our feelings
of self-worth and security and even meaning in life by being
indispensable for the others. Many parents have undermined their
children in this way.

We need to distinguish between helping because we love someone,
and helping because that makes us feel worthy or important or
strong.  Are we doing this for them or for us? 

Another trap is to help others with what they can do themselves
because we feel guilty. They play with our guilt and control us.
This is not love. It is guilt. Are we helping because we love
others and believe that they will benefit from what we do or
because we will feel guilty and responsible for their reality? A
lot of emotional blackmail takes place around guilt. 

5. Are we helping the other because we believe they cannot do
this for themselves or because we are afraid they will cease
loving us if we do not? Is this love or a fear of not being
loved? If we were sure they would love us even if we did not
help them, would we do what they are asking? 

6. Am I doing this because I believe I am responsible for the
others' reality or as a way to help them get started? Am I
solving their problem or helping solve their own? I am giving
them a fish or teaching them how to fish? Do I believe that the
other is incapable, unable to solve his or her own problems? Our
help should be like coming across someone whose car won't start.
We push them until their motor starts and then we let them
continue on their own. It would be ineffective for them and us
to keep pushing them once they got started.

7. Do I perceive the others as souls in evolution? Is what I am
doing helping the other grow more emotionally and spiritually
responsible and mature? Or am I simply allowing the personality
to become irresponsible and dependent? 

This is not always clear cut. Others may actually need to be
taken care of for periods of time and that might be exactly what
we need to do with love for our own evolution. Often however, we
pass over the boundaries that are healthy for them and us.  

Our personality seeks external security and approval. As souls
we already experience self-worth and security. If we pamper
others we may make them weaker and even more dependent on
external solutions obstructing their emotional and spiritual
maturity. But if we abandon them in a critical moment in their
life,  that walking away may temporarily harm them.

8. Do we have enough inclination, time, energy and / or money
to do what is being asked of us? 

What is our lesson here - to overcome the limitations of our
tendencies, time, energy and money and lovingly give more than
we easily can, or to be able to say "no" with love. 

What we often do in such cases is to create negative feelings
and begrudgingly do what they want or get angry and lose our
love because others are asking more than we can and want to
give. We often feel the need to get angry and close our heart
because we feel so uncomfortable with saying no and are so sure
we will lose the others love if we gave less. 

We need to remember that love requires truth and that we have
every right to be loved even when we cannot accommodate the
others' needs or requests. If we can love others even when they
do not satisfy our needs, then we can feel comfortable with
expressing our choice, with love, not to respond to the needs of
others.  When we emit love, there will be love. 

We need to determine what our lesson is in each specific
moment, by considering how important the others' needs are, how
true it is that they cannot find other solutions and how much
energy, time, money and inclination we have in the moment to
respond. Once we make that evaluation, we either do what they
are asking with love and thus receive energy from our love to
do, or, explain with love that we cannot or choose not to help
them at the moment and  the reasons for our decision. 

9. Can we do this with love? 

Or will we be doing it as a responsibility or out of fear of
not being a good person or fear of what others might say, or
fear of losing the others love? 
This is an essential question. If we answer, "no" I cannot do
this with love and joy, perhaps our lesson is to be able to
explain with love to the other that we prefer not to do what is
asked  and the reasons why. 

However our lesson might be just the opposite. We may be being
asked to let go of inner obstacles that prevent us from being
able to do what they are asking with love and joy. 

Only you can know what your lesson is. 

True love encompasses both being free to serve with love and
joy and also being able to lovingly say no.

About the Author: Robert Elias Najemy, a life coach with 30
years of experience, is the author of over 20 books, 600
articles and 400 lectures on Human Harmony. Download wonderful
ebooks, 100's of free articles, courses, and mp3 audio lectures
at http://www.HolisticHarmony.com. Find 8 of his books at



Spiritual Commandments Or Spiritual Guidelines?

Spiritual Commandments Or Spiritual Guidelines?
By Richard Blackstone

Once you start waking up to your true authentic self you begin
to change the concepts that have held you in a bondage of fear.
As you awaken to the light of true consciousness, the fears that
have enslaved you in your past don't look so fearsome in the
light of awareness.

We see things for what they are and we observe whether they
serve us or not, given our definition of who we are and who we
determine ourselves to be. So when we take on the paradigm that
we are one with God and start to challenge the institutions that
have held us in fear for so long, we begin to examine the core
concepts of all three major institutions and take a closer look
at God's commandments.

When we immerse ourselves in the concepts of unity and love we
take on the knowledge that God is the source of all that is, and
we are created in the image and likeness of God. So we are made
of the same stuff as God and have the same talents and
abilities. At the core of God is love, and at our core is love.

Our purpose, as spirit children, is to experience in the
relative physical world all that God knows conceptually in the
absolute world. Because God's true essence is love, then the
belief system that God goes by is a love-based belief system.
This is what God is. In order to experience God's belief system,
we are allowed to know what God's belief system is not. In fact
we must know and experience what God's belief system is not in
order for us to know experientially exactly what it is.

God sent his belief system to us not only in the core being
that we are, but also in a physical form so that man would have
a tangible thing to know of that represents God's value system.

We have come to describe this physical representation of these
values as “The Ten Commandments.” We have based our core
institutions of religion, education and government on them in
order to control us under threat of condemnation to hell if we
don't follow them.

When we see how all these institutions have followed the values
prescribed by these commandments we see the hypocrisy that we
have allowed ourselves to live under because of our fears. We
see how each of these institutions has lied, cheated and stolen
under the sanctimonious guise of doing it for our benefit in
order for us to get into heaven. The unholiest of unholies is
how each of these institutions has lead us to kill our fellow
human beings and say that it was justified in accordance with
God's laws and commandments.

The only God they could be talking about is the God of
separation and fear, who holds himself out to be a monarch and
who is separate from us and separate from the universe he
created. Only the God of fear would be separate from the very
commandments he sent to us and told us not to violate under
threat of condemnation to hell.

The God of Love and unity has a value system that he instilled
in us and that has been revealed to us in physical form. But
this God would not command us to never violate these values
because this God wants us to experience what we are not in order
to know what we are. How could we possibly do that if, in so
doing, we violate a commandment that she told us not to violate?

The God of Love would not do that. The God of Love would not
command us to do anything because the whole premise of our
“being” is to create the experiences on earth that we choose
using our free will, without restrictions or limitations. The
God of Love does not interfere (enter-fear) with our choices. We
make the choices. To interfere with our choices would negate the
whole premise of God's purpose and violate the process of life.

So, yes, we are privy to God's values, both within our very
souls and also within the concept of The Ten Commandments. But
instead of using these as God's commandments, we should use them
under the concept of God's guidelines. For God, in the form of
the soul, is here to guide us in this earthly journey but she is
not here to command us to do one thing or another. We are at
free choice to be and do one thing or another.

We are at free choice to call this value system “commandments”
or “guidelines.” Man, not God, is the one who has told us for
2,000 years that these are commandments, through man's written
and spoken words. But what man says or writes doesn't make it
so. Remember, everything is temporal and temporary. Everything
is a matter of perspective. The only constant in the universe is
change.

About the Author: Richard Blackstone is an award winning author
and international speaker on Love, Oneness & Creation. Journey
into discovery of Self by reading this FREE report; "The 3
Simple Immutable Laws of the Universe" at:
http://www.NutsandBoltsSpirituality.com

Source: http://www.isnare.com

Permanent Link: http://www.isnare.com/?aid=212871&ca=Religion